In 2025, Sweden achieved something virtually unheard of elsewhere: it became and may soon be recognised as the first smoke-free nation in Europe. With daily smoking rates among Swedish-born adults now as low as 4.5%, Sweden has officially dropped below the widely accepted “smoke-free” threshold of 5%.
But Sweden’s success doesn’t come from bans alone; it comes from a thoughtful, science-driven strategy grounded in harm reduction rather than prohibition. That makes Sweden not merely a success story among many, but a potential template for global tobacco and nicotine policy. Here’s why other countries should take note.
What Did Sweden Do Differently?
Embracing Safer Alternatives
- Sweden’s harm-reduction strategy acknowledges a fundamental fact: while nicotine is addictive, its combustion drives nearly all of the harm from tobacco.
- Rather than treating all nicotine use as equal, Swedish policy draws distinctions: combustible cigarettes pose far greater risks than “smoke-free” alternatives.
- As part of this shift, smokeless and lower-risk nicotine products, such as traditional “snus,” newer nicotine pouches, e-cigarettes and similar alternatives have been made accessible and socially acceptable.
Risk-Based Regulation & Taxation
- In December 2024, the Swedish Parliament formally adopted a tobacco-harm reduction policy, enshrining in law the principle that “tobacco policy must consider the varying harmful effects of different products.”
- As a result, tax policy was adjusted to reflect risk, taxes on combustible cigarettes increased, while excise duties on harm-reduced nicotine products were cut.
- This encourages smokers to switch, rather than simply raising prices across the board or pushing people toward black-market options.
Pragmatism Over Ideology
- Rather than demonising all nicotine use, Sweden chose a pragmatic path: allow adult smokers viable, less harmful alternatives.
- The results are dramatic: over decades, smoking prevalence has fallen steeply from roughly 49% in the 1960s to around 5% of adults today.
- The public health benefits have followed: compared with European averages, Sweden reports significantly lower rates of tobacco-related diseases and mortality, including cancer.
What Has Sweden’s Approach Delivered?
Lowest smoking rates in Europe: With only ~4.5% of Swedish-born adults smoking daily, Sweden now meets the threshold used by many public-health definitions of “smoke-free nation.”
- Lower disease burden: According to public-health data and research, Sweden has among the lowest tobacco-related disease and death rates in Europe.
- A viable, realistic path for nicotine users: Not everyone quits nicotine overnight, but by offering less harmful alternatives, Sweden shows that societies can drastically reduce harm without requiring total abstinence.
- Policy stability and social acceptance: The recent enshrining of harm reduction into national law signals long-term commitment.
Why Other Countries Should Adopt the Swedish Model
- It works - The empirical record is clear: smoking rates and smoking-related mortality have fallen dramatically. Sweden’s outcomes provide real-world evidence that harm reduction, not just abstinence or prohibition, can deliver public-health goals.
- It is realistic - Many adult smokers struggle to quit nicotine entirely. Offering safer alternatives accepts human behaviour while mitigating risk.
- It reduces inequities - Heavy smokers often come from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds. By providing affordable, low-risk alternatives and adjusting taxation accordingly, harm reduction can lessen health inequities.
- It saves lives at scale - If other countries replicated Sweden’s policies, proponents estimate that millions of lives could be saved across Europe over the next decade.
- It aligns with evidence-based public health - Rather than stigmatising nicotine use, Sweden’s model embraces nuance: distinguishing between risk levels and shaping policy accordingly.
Challenges, Caveats & What Policymakers Should Keep in Mind
Of course, no policy is perfect, and harm reduction is not risk-free. Some key caveats:
- Nicotine remains addictive - Even if smokeless products reduce cancer and lung-disease risk, nicotine still has health effects (e.g. cardiovascular risk) and can foster dependence.
- Dual use and youth uptake risks - There is a risk that some users could both smoke and use alternative nicotine products, or that such products could attract new, young users. Careful regulation, age restrictions, and clear public health messaging are vital.
- Regulation and oversight needed - Harm reduction only works if safer alternatives are regulated, taxed appropriately, and made available as part of a coherent, science-based policy.
Conclusion
Sweden’s journey from a high-smoking country to Europe’s first smoke-free nation is not the product of luck or a temporary fad; it is the result of decades of evidence-driven policy, strategic regulation, and pragmatic acceptance of nicotine alternatives. Its achievements underscore a powerful truth: reducing harm should be the central aim of tobacco control, not just eliminating tobacco consumption altogether.
As nations around the world grapple with rising smoking-related disease burdens, the Swedish model offers a realistic, effective and humane blueprint for public health.
Explore how Broughton supports oral nicotine manufacturers with robust analytical testing, regulatory strategy and PMTA-ready data packages. https://www.broughton-group.com/oral-nicotine-products-pmta